At last, my determination to age with disgrace and be a curmudgeonly old grump has been vindicated! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8339647.stm Now I can rejoice in my unbridled cynicism.
Filed under Life & Stuff
I'm Lotusblossom Knits. I knit, I dye yarn, I drink tea (and a lot of coffee) and I chase feral children. Occasionally I might ramble on about other stuff as well, like politics, religion and cake.
The Guardian continue their superb coverage of the aftermath of the riots and looting of the past few days
UK riots aftermath: live updates
Yesterday was a good day. Congratulations to Antonietta and Matt. I couldn’t resist a picture of Lally, completely not paying attention.
Why I'm increasingly frustrated with Twitter and never check DMs any more.
If G+ can stop this kind of thing I'll be a convert for life!
Darren Rowse originally shared this post:
Un-fucking-believable Wall Street Journal editorial blames competitors and pols for threatening press freedom (not Murdoch); calls paying sources (including, presumably, corrupt police) standard journalism; robs the Journal of its last shred of self-respect and makes clear it is a mouthpiece for Murdoch.
Journalists there, if they have any self-respect left, rise up in protest.
Jeff Jarvis originally shared this post:
The head of Scotland Yard just resigned.
That follows a story in the NYTimes yesterday that Scotland Yard not only knew about the News of The World phone hacking scandal for four years and did nothing about it, but actively worked to prevent the story from coming out. – http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/world/europe/17police.html
Brits tend to trust their institutions far more than people in the US do, but this is really going to shake that faith.
Pete Cashmore originally shared this post:
Scotland Yard and Murdoch Empire Intertwined in Hacking Case
OK! This is Cool.
Ammar Albarghouthi originally shared this post:
Plick Project http://www.youtube.com/v/K0h1oxoJ24Y&hl=en&fs=1&autoplay=1
Circle privacy
I don't want the general public to know who I have in certain circles (any family who gets on G+, for example). The settings tells me that I can control this, but so far I haven't been able to find any way to do that, let alone a simple way.
One of the reasons I've decided to try G+ after years of loudly and publicly hating Facebook is G+'s apparent commitment to privacy and information control … but this is a pretty major thing.
So what's the deal, Google? How can I allow certain people or circles to be viewable in my profile, while keeping certain other people or circles private only to me?
EDIT: Here's how you do it: Go to your profile. Click the EDIT button. Hover your mouse over the little Earth icon next to your Circles, and you'll get a menu to change it. (via +WilliamReichard, and others.)
Um … are you fucking serious, Google? Either you're deliberately making this complicated and difficult — a very Facebook thing to do, by the way — or it's profoundly bad UI design.
I realize this is still in a limited beta, so I hope Google will make a change so this is easier and more intuitive to control. Remember that a huge complaint with Facebook is how Byzantine the privacy (well, what Facebook claims is privacy) controls are. MAKE THIS EASIER, GOOGLE. It's the right thing to do.
Wil Wheaton originally shared this post:
Join the Avaaz campaign
Great article from Greta Christina on 'elevatorgate'
Greta Christina's Blog: Why We Have to Talk About This: Atheism, Sexism, and Blowing Up The Internet
